Thursday, September 30, 2010

eCommerce Rule #7: Affiliates are risky. Don't let them pick your pocket.

Affiliates are third parties that charge a commission when a user clicks through a link on one of their sites to a merchant and subsequently completes a transaction (usually a purchase). On the face of it, affiliates look like a no-brainer—the more of them you can get, the better. But don’t be fooled. It’s the Wild West out there, and certain evil affiliates are looking to pick your pocket. You are better served having a very tightly controlled affiliate program, and you need to keep a close eye on affiliates for suspicious behavior. Here are three things to watch out for:

Everyone claims credit. As we discussed in Rule #6, consumers often visit a site multiple times before completing a purchase. The larger your affiliate program, the higher the chance that your average customer clicks on the links of more than one affiliate before converting (perhaps they visit the site of a traditional affiliate, and then an online-coupon site). Because affiliates get credit for a conversion even if it occurred several days, or weeks, after the user first clicked through the affiliate’s link, this means you might find yourself with multiple parties all claiming credit for the same conversion. A 5% commission for one affiliate is fine. But if you need to pay two or more affiliates the same commission rate, your costs can add up very quickly. To minimize this, you’re better off sticking with just one affiliate program (e.g., Commission Junction, Performix, etc).

Watch out for spyware and other scams. The most insidious affiliate ploys are scams like spyware or cookie-stuffing. Ben Edelman of Harvard Business School has a great report describing how some affiliates use pop-ups, pop-unders, IFRAMEs and other little-known industry mechanisms to trick a user’s browser into downloading an affiliate’s cookie for multiple merchants—even when the user hasn’t clicked on an actual affiliate link. When the user then goes to one of the soon-to-be-defrauded merchants and makes a purchase, the affiliate scammer’s cookie claims credit for the conversion.

Other affiliates deploy good old-fashioned spyware. One of our portfolio-company executives recently was combing through his Web logs and noticed that the codes for some of his affiliates were being entered into users’ clickstreams milliseconds before transactions were finalized, thereby tricking the merchant into thinking that the affiliate had acquired those customers. The executive soon realized some of his users’ computers were infected with spyware. The spyware tracks a user’s behavior and, in the first millisecond it sees a shopping cart activated, refreshes the user’s browser and slips in the affiliate’s code. Our executive notified Commission Junction, the leading affiliate program provider, of the ruse and the affiliates were quickly terminated. But remember: no one else is looking out for you, so you need to monitor your affiliates yourself.

Don’t let them bid against you. Left unchecked, affiliates may bid on your trademark search terms, effectively fighting you for keyword ads and driving up your acquisition costs. Whats worse, often, affiliates try to take advantage of the navigational-search phenomenon we touched on in Rule #6. If a user types your brand name into Google, he almost always already knows what he wants---he just wants to get there quickly. But if he ends up clicking on an affiliate’s link instead of your own, you’ll have to pay the affiliate for the conversion even though you did all the hard (and expensive) work to lure in the user in the first place.  Talk about a free ride!

--> Go to Rule #8
--> Go to Table of Contents / Introduction

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

eCommerce Rule #6: Only lemmings focus on last-click marketing

Since the advent of online advertising, the conventional wisdom among Web marketers is that the provider of the “last click” that delivers a user to a particular Web site before a purchase “closed the deal”, and therefore deserves all of the resulting ROI credit. Consequently, for years, Web marketers have been determining where to invest their online marketing dollars based on the last thing someone clicked on before converting.  This methodology has serious shortcomings.

One is that it discounts the classic “marketing funnel”. The marketing funnel is a relatively old-school marketing concept but remains very relevant today. It describes the manner in which most consumers go about making purchasing decisions. In the beginning, consumers cast a wide net—just like the wide top of a funnel. They do broad-ranging research and consider a number of products from a number of providers. But then most consumers start to narrow their choices. Their research becomes more targeted, and they look at fewer products as they figure out what they really want. Finally, they’re at that narrow bottom of the funnel, having decided on the one product that best suits their needs.

But the last-click methodology ignores this critical funnel concept. If a consumer visits, say, a number of Web sites several times over many days (including a few visits to, weeks or even months before making a purchase—and is exposed to a wide variety of online media during that time period—why does the keyword he clicked on right before buying a new computer at get all the credit for his new laptop purchase? It doesn’t make sense.

Another big problem with last-click marketing is that last clicks are often just “navigational” searches: Consumers use sites like Google and Yahoo as search engines, but also as navigation engines. What we mean by “navigation engine” is that a user already knows where he wants to go (to look at a particular printer on the Staples Web site, for instance) but is using a search engine to get there quickly. Consumers have been trained to behave this way because the internal-search capability on most Web sites is quite poor. Consider: A Google search for “Staples HP Laserjet 1200 toner” yields a link to the relevant page on as the 6th result. But a search for “HP Laserjet 1200 toner” on the web site yields 15 incorrect links ahead of the target page. Searching with Google is actually more efficient than searching the retailer’s web site directly. This is important because it means the marketing channel that drove a customer’s first visit (e.g., a comparison shopping engine (CSE)) might be more valuable than the channel that drove the last visit (e.g., Google search for “Staples HP Laserjet 1200 toner”).  But again, with last click, marketers are told to invest more in "Staples HP Laserjet 1200 toner", and less in the CSE, even though that CSE was what exposed the consumer to Staples in the first place.

None of this mattered much until recently. Through 2008, traditional, last-click online marketing had consistently provided a highly attractive ROI with ever-increasing customer volumes. But lately, competition for customers among online marketers has intensified; more marketers are buying online keywords and bidding up their prices. As a result, e-tailers have to spend more money to acquire the same number of customers. What was once a highly attractive ROI has become less compelling. It’s time to sharpen your pencil.

It is becoming increasingly clear that attributing “conversion credit” to the last marketing link a user clicks before making a purchase is highly flawed. More often than not, the last-click approach rewards navigational keyword searches. More troubling, it incents online marketers to stop investing in the top-of-the-funnel marketing sources that actually acquired the customer in the first place. Nonetheless, the last-click methodology is ingrained in widely used Web-analytics offerings like Adobe SearchCenter (fka Omniture) and Google Analytics. These analytics companies make recommendations about keyword bidding and other online marketing strategies based on that obviously flawed methodology.

A new breed of marketing analytics vendors including Convertro (another BVP portfolio company) are pioneering a much more intelligent approach. These companies adhere to a concept called, fittingly, “multi-attribution.” In multi-attribution, credit for a purchase is distributed across every marketing event that drove a consumer to a particular Web site, instead of just allocating credit to the last one.

You’ll be shocked by how the multi-attribution approach will prompt changes to how you allocate your online marketing dollars. (Hint: most affiliates won’t like it, and neither will Google’s AdWords team.) We’ve seen companies use this new approach to suddenly increase their return on ad spend (ROAS) by more than 50%, even though they thought they’d tapped out their online-marketing effectiveness.

Speaking of online marketing allocations, display advertising has played the part of the ignored, ugly sibling of search advertising for far too long. Marketers have often embraced a spray-and-pray approach to display ads and haven’t known how to measure their ROI (a cause that wasn’t helped by the last-click paradigm). This is changing thanks to retargeting companies like Criteo (in the BVP portfolio). With retargeting, a merchant is able to show a display ad to users who visited the merchant’s site but didn’t buy anything. Later, when those users are on a third-party site, a retargeting ad promotes the merchant’s brand. The hope is that the ad will draw the user back to the merchant’s online store. Some retargeting companies, like Criteo, take retargeting one step further. Instead of showing only the company’s brand in the display ad, they show the actual products the consumer browsed (or, even better yet, related products that the consumer may have missed). Retargeting has fast become a must-have tool in any online marketer’s toolkit. If you don’t retarget your visitors, your competitors will.

--> Go to Introduction / Table of Contents
--> Go to Rule #7

Thursday, September 23, 2010

eCommerce Rule #5: It’s the service, stupid

In Rule #1, we discussed the importance of building a brand penny by penny with direct response advertising.   Embedded in this rule was the assumption that your offering "works."  Paying Google and other media companies to drive new users to your site is only the first step. To build a brand and a sustainable, profitable business, you want those customers to come back to you again and again – without your having to pay for them again and again! To get customers coming back, knock their socks off with an extraordinary customer experience.

This orientation is a commitment that needs to permeate everything you do in your company.  As Jeff Bezos said, "Start with the customer, and work backwards."  In addition to offering low-cost products and getting them out the door quickly, you should bend over backwards to offer friendly customer service throughout the entire fulfillment process. Train your sales reps as if they’re working at the Four Seasons hotel chain. Don’t rush customers off the phone. In general, always empower your reps to please customers first and save costs later. At Zappos, for instance, a rep once fielded an eight-hour customer service phone call, while another delivered fresh flowers to cheer up a customer. These examples are extreme, but they’re the inspirational stories that help define company culture and drive powerful word-of-mouth promotion among consumers. This type of culture needs to be instilled throughout your entire company; every senior executive should spend some time every month taking customer service calls.

Another good idea: Creating fabulous surprises for your customers, such as unsolicited coupons, refunds or credits, gifts, or even just patience, apologies and empathy. Across most industries today (think banking, travel, cable TV), the average telephone- or email-based customer-service experience is so bad that it’s actually pretty easy to be surprisingly fabulous. Other surprises can be baked into your core offering. Zappos, to praise the company again, has a 365-day return policy with free return shipping. Consumers take full advantage by returning almost 40% of the things they purchase on the site.

You should carefully monitor customer-service metrics such as average wait time (email and phone); abandon rate; average call length; and number of calls needed to resolve an issue. There is a significant increase in abandon rates after 90 seconds of wait time. If you can answer 90% of calls in 120 seconds from when the customer first dials your number, you’re well on your way to becoming a best-practices, customer-service organization.

And, finally, while you should always work hard to delight your customers, don’t be afraid to fire the perennially annoying ones who waste your time and cost you money. When a consumer calls to complain about a product or claims she never received it, check to see if she’s a first-time caller. If so, give her the benefit of the doubt (a full refund, express shipping, etc.). If this isn’t the first time, don’t be afraid to give her some tough love. Try to understand what marketing channels or products drive these less desired customers and make appropriate adjustments to reduce them or at least make them more profitable.

--> Go to Introduction / Table of Contents
--> Go to Rule #6

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

eCommerce Rule #4: Your goal: cheap, fast and free

If there is one thing you can count on, it’s that consumers will always want lower prices. And once a consumer spends money online, she wants immediate gratification. So for an online retailer, there’s nothing more important than price and availability.  This is the core advantage of scale in eCommerce, but also what new eCommerce models like Vente-Privee in Europe and Gilt Groupe in the US have been able to leverage for tremendous success.  In our view, the best e-commerce companies will offer products at low cost and deliver them quickly—and, often, free of charge.

Cheap. It takes just a few clicks for consumers to figure out the market price for any item on the Web. You don’t have to offer the cheapest price on all products all of the time. But you should be rock-bottom on those items your customers will use to judge you. Consumers aren’t dumb; they generally won’t pay more than they have to. Don’t forget this.

Fast. The biggest disadvantage to shopping online, as opposed to in a brick-and-mortar retailer, is the lack of instant satisfaction. Until the moment of delivery, a consumer has spent his or her hard-earned money but has nothing to show for it—no new Jimmy Choos to wear out on the town, no new leaf blower to show off to the neighbors. Not surprisingly, then, quick delivery is key to delighting customers. A recent survey of U.S. consumers conducted by STELLAService confirmed that the leading factor in determining great customer service was delivery speed:

Companies that care about customer service are laser-focused on fast shipping. For example, our portfolio company QuidSi boasts of reaching 70% of US consumers overnight and the rest in two days. To offer your customers the products they want quickly, we believe you need to control the entire customer-fulfillment experience. In the beginning, this may mean using a third-party logistics company (3PL) to own and operate your back end or drop-shippers to fulfill the long tail of SKUs. But once you hit a few million dollars in annualized gross profit, you should keep as many of your SKUs as possible in stock in your own warehouse so you control those products from the moment a consumer clicks “buy” to the moment he or she receives your delivery. Then you can start thinking about fast shipping.

There are two ways to minimize your shipping times. The first is the Amazon approach. If you’re like most retailers and lack the gross margins to afford next-day air delivery, build multiple distribution centers across the US, as Amazon has done, and optimize your delivery from each center to each customer. Amazon has 19 distribution centers in the US alone. You need massive scale to support 19 warehouses, but even splitting into two DCs – to cover each side of the Mississippi – will improve average ship times considerably. And don’t be afraid of regional shippers like OnTrac or LoneStar. They’ll help you reach pockets of the US faster and cheaper than UPS and FedEx. There are also third-party services like Ensenda and Enroute to help manage the complexity.

There’s also the Zappos approach to shipping. The shoe retailer, with its 40+% gross margins, was able to leverage its rich gross margins and standardized shipping boxes to ship all its products via next-day FedEx air delivery and place its sole distribution center in Nevada. This is easy and effective, but few retail categories can afford it.

Free. Unless you have a unique value proposition or are selling the type of product that costs more to ship than to buy, consumers now expect a path to free shipping when they shop online. According to a recent comScore survey, 23% of consumers only purchase items with free shipping, and 51% of consumers are at least “somewhat likely” to cancel their order if they don’t have a free shipping option. It may even make sense to increase your prices slightly to eliminate shipping charges. We’ve seen this tactic actually improve conversion rates for some e-tailers. Run the numbers, and figure out how you can make free shipping an option for your visitors. Avoid losing your shirt by setting a minimum order size before free shipping kicks in.

--> Go to Introduction / Table of Contents
--> Go to Rule #5 - It's the service, stupid.

Thursday, September 16, 2010

eCommerce RULE #3: The 6 “Cs” are your vital signs: Ignore them at your peril!

These 6 “Cs” are metrics that provide an unparalleled window into the health of your online retail business.

1.  Company Net Promoter Score, or NPS, is a customer loyalty metric developed by Satmetrix, Bain & Company, and Fred Reichheld. This score is determined by posing a simple question to consumers; it’s a query designed to screen for customer loyalty. Consumers are asked, “On a scale of 0 to 10, how likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague?” Consumers offering a rating of 9 or 10 are anointed “promoters”, implying they could heavily promote the company to others. Those who give a rating of 7-8 are “passives”—maybe they might not do anything. Those at the lower end of the scale, with ratings of 0-6, are dubbed “detractors,” since they might speak ill of a company and hurt its prospects with other potential customers.

A company calculates its overall net-promoter score by subtracting its percentage of detractors from its percentage of promoters. So, if 65% of an e-commerce firm’s customers rank as promoters, and 15% as detractors, the firm’s overall NPS would be 50. You should ask every customer this simple NPS question after they’ve received their shipment. 

Track and monitor your NPS every month and discuss it in your management and board meetings. Slice and dice the metric to study specific people who have interacted with your customer-service team or who processed a product return. You’ll be surprised by the insights that will jump out. Check out to compare your score against the best brands on the planet, like Amazon, Apple and Google. Tracking NPS is invaluable.

2.  Customer lifetime value, or CLTV. As discussed in Rule #2, CLTV is the net present value (NPV) of the profit from a customer’s purchases. A profitable customer will have a CLTV in excess of its CAC (see next metric).

3.  Customer acquisition cost (CAC). This is quite simply your fully-loaded average cost to acquire a new customer. You should track this over time. However, averages can be misleading; not all customers are created equal. You’ll always have one group of customers that come back to your site multiple times and are profitable to you. Others may come once, perhaps pick up some of your lower-margin SKUs—and never return. Remember: Your goal is to optimize CLTV minus CAC. This means that trying to keep your CAC down is not always your best bet: Sometimes your better customers (those that return and/or buy higher margin SKUs) are a little more expensive to acquire. But they’re worth it. If your current average CLTV is at least 2X your average CAC, and most of that comes in year one, you’ve got enormous upside potential.

4.  Conversion rate. For most e-tailers, the relevant conversion rate is the percentage of new visitors that convert to buyers. Here, traditional blocking-and-tackling concepts like streamlined landing pages and fast page-load times are king. If you want to take this metric to the next level, you should think of your conversion rate as a conversion of visitors to revenue producers (not necessarily to buyers)—or, better yet, to gross profit contributors. Essentially, what you are trying to measure is how much money you make from each visit to your website. It’s the equivalent of the eRPM (effective revenue per thousand impressions) most Web publishers use to measure their businesses. But here, we suggest eGPV (effective gross profit per visit). Compare the eGPV for all of your visits, and tweak the site paths that are falling below the average. Adding additional revenue streams such as on site advertising may help to optimize this metric.

5.  Churn. Yes, e-commerce businesses have churn too! This is the percentage of visitors to your site that don’t come back to buy anything else. You should also, of course, track the number of monthly visitors who are returning customers.

6.  Cash-conversion cycle and return on invested capital. Only the simple-minded focus on the P&L statement. No one cares what your profits are if you don’t generate any cash flow. Online retail can be tricky because there are lots of ways to burn cash even when you’re generating income-statement profits. Inventory and warehouse equipment can consume a lot of cash, particularly during periods of high growth. The best online retailers actually boast a negative cash-conversion cycle. In other words, they get paid by their customers before they have to pay their suppliers. Amazon and Blue Nile have negative cash-conversion cycles, so it’s perhaps not surprising that these companies have the most attractive valuation metrics in the online retail industry. For example, below, we plotted all the pure-play online retailers, with their cash conversion cycle on the X-axis and their TEV/LTM Gross Profit on the Y-axis. You can see that Blue Nile, with its average -47 day cash conversion cycle for the past four quarters, is valued at a multiple of almost 12X, and Amazon, with its –26 day cash conversion cycle is valued at a little over 8X. Leading competitors, with much longer, less attractive cash conversion cycles, most have valuations hovering around just 3X. 

Be aware of this, and make smart tradeoffs between vendor-discounts and stretching payables whenever you can. If you want to get really sophisticated, measure cash conversion on a SKU-by-SKU basis.

--> Go to Rule #4
--> Go to Introduction / Table of Contents

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

eCommerce RULE #2: Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) is your new pulse

As you build your direct response marketing campaign discussed in Rule #1, remember to focus on the lifetime value of your customer, or how much profit that customer will generate during the course of your relationship. 

The textbook definition of CLTV is the net present value (NPV) of the profit from a customer’s purchases. Remember to include all the sales that result from a customer’s repeat visits, less any associated costs to service the resulting orders (include variable costs like COGS, credit-card processing fees, shipping, warehouse-order processing, etc). A profitable customer will have a CLTV in excess of its customer acquisition cost (CAC). Treat these profitable customers well. 

Once you have a good handle on this metric, you shouldn’t be afraid to spend until the marginal CAC (your CAC to acquire the next customer) approaches the CLTV of your next incremental customer, even if it costs more to acquire that new customer than you recoup on his or her first purchase. Note: This doesn’t mean you should spend until the average CAC approaches your CLTV. Rather, you want to spend to acquire customers until your marginal contribution (CLTV – CAC for each new customer) equals zero.  Anything less is under-investing in your business. 

Obviously, this can be a very scary pill to swallow, so make sure you really understand your CLTV before jumping in. For early-stage companies, estimating a customer’s lifetime value can be more of an art than a science. If you’re not fully confident you have a handle on this, instead spend right up to the average, fully-loaded gross profit of a customer’s first order. Then you can focus on driving repeat usage. 

In the beginning, your average CLTV will be low because you won’t have scale. But as you grow, you’ll start to see some of the benefits of scale, such as: 
  • Getting better terms from vendors, because you’re buying more (which drives up your gross margins); 
  • The ability to offer your customers a broader selection of higher-margin, slower-moving SKUs (which increases your average order value, your gross margins, and your customer satisfaction); 
  • The data to offer better product recommendations (which also increases your average order value and improves conversion rates); etc. 
All of these things will increase your CLTV. This kicks off a virtuous cycle: CLTV goes up; you can afford to spend more money on marketing; you start to grow faster; you get more scale —and on and on and on. 

It’s critical to calculate CLTV as accurately as possible, since it will drive much of your marketing decision making. At scale, follow this rule of thumb: If your CLTV is at least 2X the cost of acquiring a new customer, with at least 1X coming in the first 12 months after acquisition, you’re in great shape. If you’re doing any better than that, it’s irresponsible for you not to be spending more aggressively on marketing. (And please, call us so we can invest in your company!) If your CLTV/CAC ratio is less than two, then it’s worth reigning in your marketing spend until you grow into it.

--> Go to Rule #3
--> Return to Introduction / Table of Contents

Thursday, September 9, 2010

eCommerce RULE #1: You must build a brand, but not through brand advertising

The ultimate goal for any consumer offering--and the goal that will frame the remaining nine rules--is to build a brand. If your brand becomes synonymous with a particular category (e.g. books for Amazon, DVDs for Netflix) you gain tremendous leverage in your marketing spend. But exactly how you build a brand has changed a lot in the last decade.

Forget sock puppets and pricey Super Bowl ads. So 1999! Brand strength today is built penny by penny (and order by order) with effective direct-response advertising that can be quantified and measured. In some categories your marketing campaign can attract customers for as little as $10 apiece. If your offering works (more on that later), those customers you snag will generate more than $10 (say, $30) of profit over their lifetimes. Then, you can reinvest that $30 in more online marketing. Rinse, lather, repeat.  You have a growth (and profit) generation machine.

Once you get big enough that you’re spending millions of dollars on direct-response advertising, you can think about more traditional brand advertising. When you can afford it, brand marketing will help you finally convert customers that you probably have touched before with your direct response advertising, but just need an extra nudge. Essentially, if done right, brand marketing becomes yet another form of direct response advertising.

Consider this: Zappos, the online-shoe retailer scooped up by for $847 million last year, didn’t run its first television ad until 2008, even though it was founded in 1999. Clearly CEO Tony Hsieh and his crew knew how to build their company’s brand penny by penny. By the time Zappos went on TV, as many people in the U.S. were searching for Zappos by name on Google’s search engine as were searching for Adidas, a globally recognized brand.

Another tip: As you scale your online marketing spend, run lots of marketing experiments of at least $10,000-20,000 apiece. These might include using different marketing channels like certain comparison-shopping sites that you’ve never worked with, vertical-ad networks or even new advertising techniques like retargeting. Measure the results on a multi-attribution basis and invest in the ones that work well. You may be surprised where the best return-on-investment comes from. Certainly, monitor your ROI and tweak as necessary.

Finally, it’s important to point out that penny-at-a-time advertising doesn’t guarantee you will actually succeed in building a brand. We touch on some of the critical elements of successful brand building in the remaining rules (especially Nos. 4, 5, 8 and 9). While there may not be a clear and concise formula for building a great brand, we’re certain about one thing: It’s virtually impossible to build a brand through excessive marketing. So don't try it. All of your marketing should be measurable and profitable. If you follow the rest of our ten laws of e-commerce, and steadily increase your marketing expenditures in a profitable way, you'll lure more and more consumers to your store--and eventually, your brand will emerge. If it doesn’t, you’ve almost certainly been ignoring several of our other rules.

--> Rule #2.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Bessemer's Top 10 Laws of eCommerce: Introduction

The dot-com bubble is long behind us, but online commerce is still red-hot. In the late 1990s, the conventional wisdom was that the transformation from “bricks to clicks” for retailers would happen almost instantly. Yet over the past ten years, it’s become clear that the shift to the Web was not a two- to three- year revolution, but a 15-20 year evolution.

According to comScore, non-travel/auto/gas/food e-commerce sales represented just 7.1% of total retail sales in the US in Q2 2010. But, significantly, online sales have grown at an annualized rate of 9.7% since 2006 (vs. the 2.3% annualized decline in total retail sales over that same period, which includes the Great Recession). Leading online retailers, like, are growing even faster—30% per year for the past several years. This growth in e-commerce should only accelerate.

Companies like Zappos, Bessemer portfolio company QuidSi (operator of and, Vente Privee, Netflix and others are creating new online-retail categories and pulling offline dollars onto the Web. But a lot has changed since the heady—and money-losing—days of eToys and Today’s successful e-commerce sites don’t just throw products up on a Web site and spend tens of millions of dollars on traditional brand advertising to promote them. The rules of the game today are much more complex and, in many ways, scientific: They involve astute use of targeted, direct-response advertising, for instance, and careful calculations about the lifetime value of each customer. Those leading the e-commerce pack today also display a laser-like focus on customer service, including offering fast and/or free product delivery. (Consider Zappos, which ships customers their shoes overnight.)

At Bessemer, we’ve been lucky to have participated in each successive wave of retail innovation since the mid-1980s, starting with our investments in “big-box” retailers like Staples, The Sports Authority, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Eagle Hardware & Garden. In the late 1990s, we funded several first-generation Internet retailers. Some of these early-stage investments, like Blue Nile, became successful public companies and went on to embody the initial promise of online retail. Others, like eToys, burned brightly for a time but faded quickly in the face of the uneconomic (read: way-too-expensive) customer acquisition model that plagued many early Web pioneers.

Together with the e-tail industry at large, we learned lots of hard lessons about building sustainable and valuable e-commerce businesses. That can only be done, in our view, by focusing on the smart development of a consumer brand through profitable customer acquisition and extraordinary customer service. Among today’s successes, according to those criteria: QuidSi (operator of and, Delivery Agent and Onestop Internet. Moreover, we continue to invest in other types of category-leading companies that play in the e-commerce ecosystem, like Criteo and Convertro, which are becoming indispensible tools to help e-tailers exploit the increasing complex opportunities in online marketing

So now, we offer our own rulebook for this dynamic and rapidly growing sector—Bessemer’s Top 10 Laws of E-Commerce.  I'll publish each rule here on my blog for the next five Tuesdays and Thursdays.  We intend to turn this into a white paper eventually, so to the extent you have any feedback or thoughts, please let me know!  So without further ado:

  1. You must build a brand, but not through brand advertising (link)
  2. Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV) is your new pulse (link)
  3. The 6 “Cs” are your vital signs: Ignore them at your peril! (link)
  4. Your goal: cheap, fast and free (link)
  5. It’s the service, stupid (link)
  6. Only lemmings focus on last-click marketing (link)
  7. Affiliates are risky. Don’t let them pick your pocket. (link)
  8. WWAD (What Would Amazon Do)? (link)
  9. Identify your best customers, encourage customer loyalty, and motivate the evangelicals (link)
  10. Keep it social, but keep your data too (link)