Findings indicate that youth in the program group were no more likely than control group youth to have abstained from sex and, among those who reported having had sex, they had similar numbers of sexual partners and had initiated sex at the same mean age. Contrary to concerns raised by some critics of the Title V, Section 510 abstinence funding, however, program group youth were no more likely to have engaged in unprotected sex than control group youth.
Let's hope this ridiculously transparent initiative doesn't get anymore federal funding. We deserve more separation between church and state.
Here, by the way, is a counter-article from a woman who helped design the abstinence curriculum for one program, if you want to see the other perspective on the study: "Don't Believe the Headlines" from EducationNews.org.
Here, by the way, is a counter-article from a woman who helped design the abstinence curriculum for one program, if you want to see the other perspective on the study: "Don't Believe the Headlines" from EducationNews.org.
No ROI is a humorous way to put it. I remember reading that the abstinence initiative receives close to $177 MM in federal funding every year.
ReplyDelete